Ya know, I'm not sure I agree or disagree with the overall message of this article, but it has so many bad parts that it leaves me ... pretty cold. It's so flawed.

Since the time of Plato, the well known question of Nature vs Nurture has been asked. Conrad Lorenz pretty much answered it by saying it is both and how it interacts. Over and over in this article I see an "either or" when it should be "both". To be competent, a person must be able to hold and resolve two competing ideas in their mind at the same time. This skips that critical step. I just give one example - "even the WHO states that gender is socially constructed". It is as silly as saying any outcome in humans is an "either or" when it is obviously both... or maybe gender didn't exist before society.