I really really like this succinct, relevant analysis and summary of a long complicated work, but I think it is missing something important. It's a little weird from most people's perspectives, but think about it and you may wonder how it fits in. I've spent decades working it out, but I'll try to briefly make the point here. The game is going to change due to modern medicine.

I study how humans can adapt strategically and genetically for long term survival and development in the new, post tribal world we have been creating. In ecological terms, we are in a new world. Importantly, what we call human progress is the removal of natural selection. It took a quantitative change with vaccines, which also caused a population explosion. No species can survive the removal of natural selection. In order to, humans will have to husband their genes to replace the missing natural selection that normally keeps the genes healthy. I explain in "Genetics For A New Human Ecology" how this can be done ethically and economically. Survival is conservative, so I am as well. I don't advocate change, because it is dangerous to survival, so I describe minimum requirements. No supermen... though I think humans are pretty super already. Still, we are going to have to husband our genes. First off, our genetics represent an incredible form of wealth that can be increased, inherited for free, cannot be hoarded and represents incredible economic wealth. This genetic problem and situation does not apply only to the elites. It applies to anyone that reproduces with DNA.

I could say more, but the point of this is that the game has changed. I think it will break the trajectory you have projected. It had better or humans will not survive. If you are interested, glance at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjVieFKevMk . It's a good description though the book is more up to date. I am currently working on it's companion book: "Strategy For A New Human Ecology".

We have created a new world. New things are going to happen.