I appreciate this article, but I tend to cringe when i see something like "They might advise us to take the correct exit from the technological highway to our demise. " Why does everyone want to think in terms of technology and skip biology, especially human biology? I do see technology as a problem, but I see a much closer and larger existential threat from our genes. I work to describe how humans can adapt genetically and strategically to the new ecology we have created since we left our ancestral hunter-gatherer tribal ecology for the cities and farms of civilization. Technology is just one sub-problem. Looking at it in terms of biology, the first thing I saw was a huge problem in that what we call human progress is the removal of natural selection. No species can survive the genetic load of broken that will lead to, especially due to the de novo mutations that occur each generation. I wrote a book called "Genetics For A New Human Ecology" https://www.amazon.com/dp/1544900996 (on YouTube as well) to describe an ethical economical way to solve that problem and it opens up new doors for humanity that also seem to get ignored. Now after decades of work, I think I've solved the strategy problem as well. I once wrote an essay for my zagwap.com site called "Badass Morality". Not just about survival, but about being very hard to kill.